HP ProBook 470 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 470 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8102
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '20 at 18:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 52.7
2-Core 134
54% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 192
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 M340
HP(103C 811C) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 25.20.15030.4
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 7.73
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 10.1
6% 9.97 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.35
5% 6.46 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Verbatim Vi500 S3 480GB SSD
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 396 406 417 411 413 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 456
Write 415
Mixed 342
SusWrite 403
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 22
105% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 34.3
75% 152 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 470 G3 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 470 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback