| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 83% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H97M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141009 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 27 '20 at 18:07 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | AUT-User |
| Background CPU | 21% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
71%
Very good
|
65% 107 Pts
|
42% 314 Pts
|
19% 308 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
83%
Excellent
|
84% 104 fps
|
81% 98.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 233 212 221 217 207 MB/s
|
64.5%
Good
|
65% 290 MB/s
|
101% 39.1 MB/s
|
67% 111 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79
291GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 341 391 411 410 409 MB/s
|
83.9%
Excellent
|
90% 399 MB/s
|
124% 45.7 MB/s
|
163% 200 MB/s
|
|
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 210 210 208 211 211 MB/s
|
87.8%
Excellent
|
90% 125 MB/s
|
160% 2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.3%
Average
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
41% 14.5 GB/s
|
57% 69.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 976 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 251x |
| Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 120x |
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 109x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 92x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 73x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 62x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $390 |