Asus P7H55D-M EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55D-M EVO (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091229
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '20 at 17:48
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 92.9 1-Core 72.8 2-Core 139 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 274 36% 268 Pts	64-Core 260 16% 260 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4600 1,222 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 0408) 768MB Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.0 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	4.24% Terrible	Lighting 5.27 Reflection 6.73 Parallax 1.94 4% 4.64 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 4.23 Splatting 5.13 4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.24% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 95 6.3 1.9 153 50 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.8% Poor	Read 199 Write 176 Mixed 108 SusWrite 77 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 17.8 4K Mixed 9.2 41% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 17.6 DQ Write 20.7 DQ Mixed 15 12% 17.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 14.2 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 11.3 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55D-M EVO Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55D-M EVO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	21x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	14x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	7x

SSD
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $71Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	4x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	28x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	19x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $518

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16