Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF (all builds)
Memory	58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190924
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '20 at 17:22
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	ALB-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2970WX-$1,509 1,966 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 82.1 1-Core 127 2-Core 250 84% 153 Pts	4-Core 473 8-Core 804 78% 639 Pts	64-Core 3,607 223% 3,607 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB 26,659 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 484GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 436 438 439 389 400 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 441 Mixed 404 SusWrite 422 99% 438 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 78.5 4K Mixed 46.2 151% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 273 DQ Mixed 242 189% 259 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 123%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 191 196 198 198 187 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 190 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 193 109% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 180 192 194 195 185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 196 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 188 108% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 108%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB 6,021 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 39GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 50 26 24 24 24 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 152 Write 60.5 Mixed 73.1 SusWrite 35.1 93% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.8 192% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x16GB 2,802 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	MC Read 34.8 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 32.4 94% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 35.9 SC Mixed 29.8 85% 29.8 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

CPU
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	86x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	44x
Ryzen TR 2920XAMDBench 81%, 3,902 samples	39x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	17x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	14x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	5x
F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 128%, 25 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 94%, 8,912 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,053

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16