| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Dell Precision M4400 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0R906R |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130604 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 26 '20 at 18:53 |
| Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo T9900-$159
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
42.8%
Average
|
40% 57.3 Pts
|
11% 80.4 Pts
|
5% 84.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro FX 770M
Dell(1028 0250) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
|
2.2%
Terrible
|
2% 2.47 fps
|
3% 3.48 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial M500 240GB-$54
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 149 139 139 136 138 MB/s
|
38.7%
Below average
|
45% 201 MB/s
|
49% 16.1 MB/s
|
94% 127 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
18.1%
Very poor
|
16% 5.57 GB/s
|
15% 5.13 GB/s
|
42% 95.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision M4400 Builds (Compare 31 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Precision M4400
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo T9900Intel $159Bench 41%, 1,008 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Extreme X9100Intel $150Bench 41%, 548 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $201 |