| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-MX USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130204 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 26 '20 at 18:00 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | IRL-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.7%
Good
|
68% 110 Pts
|
28% 209 Pts
|
14% 221 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
|
52.7%
Above average
|
53% 66.2 fps
|
53% 63.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung HN-M500MBB 500GB-$80
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 61 39 48 57 71 MB/s
|
39.8%
Below average
|
45% 61 MB/s
|
139% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 181 181 180 184 182 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
103% 144 MB/s
|
166% 1.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47%
Average
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
37% 13 GB/s
|
61% 66 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-MX USB3 Builds (Compare 531 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 69x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 68x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 51x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 40x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 28x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 27x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |