Atcomputers ALZA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAtcomputers ALZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H310M-R R2.0
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '20 at 15:40
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 730
75% 606 Pts
64-Core 692
43% 692 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 89 66 66 65 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 461
Write 277
Mixed 314
SusWrite 119
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 31.5
138% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 172
155% 231 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 100%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
340GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 103 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 52
SusWrite 103
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 25
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 27.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ALZA Builds (Compare 1,273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO

System: Atcomputers ALZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $829
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback