Asus P5QL PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5QL PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '20 at 13:21
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5200-$47
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 35.4
2-Core 69.1
36% 54.9 Pts
4-Core 69.3
8-Core 69.7
9% 69.5 Pts
64-Core 68.5
4% 68.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F8) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.27
Reflection 3.23
Parallax 3.31
3% 3.27 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 6.04
4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 94 78 80 74 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 182
Write 171
Mixed 39
SusWrite 84.8
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
9GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 77 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43% Average
Read 72.5
Write 72
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 77.3
49% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5QL PRO Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QL PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback