Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '20 at 06:20
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 87.6 1-Core 83.5 2-Core 157 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 503 46% 386 Pts	64-Core 478 30% 478 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340 26,573 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Asus(1043 04DF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.3 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Lighting 74.3 Reflection 63.6 Parallax 98 61% 78.6 fps	MRender 63.5 Gravity 66.7 Splatting 81.7 59% 70.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 333 333 332 332 315 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 704 Write 575 Mixed 596 SusWrite 354 125% 557 MB/s	4K Read 47.9 4K Write 84.6 4K Mixed 59.9 194% 64.1 MB/s	DQ Read 413 DQ Write 402 DQ Mixed 448 325% 421 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 280%
LB M3 1T SSD 1TB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 553GB free Firmware: 907XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 330 311 336 327 330 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 501 Write 418 Mixed 404 SusWrite 324 92% 412 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 85.4 4K Mixed 25.4 112% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 26.1 62% 125 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 80%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 138GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 316 295 319 313 315 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Read 410 Write 366 Mixed 316 SusWrite 308 79% 350 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 43.8 143% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 37.9 DQ Write 93.3 DQ Mixed 50.6 43% 60.6 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 186GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 195 236 163 228 213 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 340 Mixed 437 SusWrite 214 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 42.1 4K Write 87.4 4K Mixed 53.8 179% 61.1 MB/s	DQ Read 40.1 DQ Write 28.3 DQ Mixed 92.1 53% 53.5 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 369GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 183 183 181 182 184 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Read 143 Write 142 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 180 90% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 367GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 145 147 146 146 147 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 132 Write 131 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 143 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR3-1600 CL11 4GB 4x4GB 338 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.5% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 15.9 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 12.3 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	139x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $493

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16