Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '20 at 02:50
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 146
2-Core 293
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 788
86% 681 Pts
64-Core 799
49% 799 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.1% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 61.9
32% 57.3 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 57.9
46% 57 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 197 191 188 189 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 487
Mixed 346
SusWrite 225
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 54.1
195% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 252
212% 311 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 110%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 192 193 194 192 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 151
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 192
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
51GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 107
Mixed 65
SusWrite 102
69% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
36GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 89.8
Write 75
Mixed 65
SusWrite 73.5
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
187% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 28.7
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 29.7
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 53.6
75% 53.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,923 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $771
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback