Samsung RV415/RV515/E3415

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive12.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung RV415/RV515/E3415  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV415/RV415
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '20 at 22:40
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-350
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Memory 31.2
1-Core 1.2
2-Core 16.7
13% 16.4 Pts
4-Core 5.2
8-Core 16.3
1% 10.8 Pts
64-Core 13.6
1% 13.6 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HDWM110 1TB
796GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HEF01A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 62 62 76 86 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 79.4
Write 65.7
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 77.3
17% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 4.2
16% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 25%
Seagate ST96812AS 59GB
26GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 15 16 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 19.4
Write 19.8
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 16
13% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 22%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
12GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.2 0.7 4.2 4.6 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 10.1
Mixed 9.4
SusWrite 3.4
12% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.3
82% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 RMT3170ME68F9F1600 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.62% Terrible
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 1.9
6% 2.23 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 1.4
SC Mixed 0.6
2% 0.8 GB/s
Latency 248
16% 248 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 6.62%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV415/RV515/E3415 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV415/RV515/E3415

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback