Acer Predator PH315-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienta_CFS
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJan 25 '20 at 16:23
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 248
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 678
71% 570 Pts
64-Core 680
42% 680 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1263) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9931
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 45
Reflection 32.6
Parallax 38.9
37% 38.8 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 37
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 104 76 91 74 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 453
Write 250
Mixed 307
SusWrite 103
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 30
119% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 189
163% 239 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 78%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
825GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 86 84 83 85 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 84.7
Write 56
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 83.5
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
170% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 11.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-51 Builds (Compare 3,790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback