Dell Studio XPS 7100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio XPS 7100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0GK1K2
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '20 at 13:32
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 88
44% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 176
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2774) 3GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.1.1
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20% Very poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 19.1
Parallax 36.1
20% 26.5 fps
MRender 20.1
Gravity 28
Splatting 25.3
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 20%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BF18 180GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LUDi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 164 165 172 170 173 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.7% Average
Read 213
Write 200
Mixed 187
SusWrite 168
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 20.8
74% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 113
90% 125 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 79%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 1TB
661GB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 140 141 146 148 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 148
Write 151
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 145
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.1
239% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 140%
Generic- Compact Flash 4GB
3GB free, PID 9106
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.9 6.1 6.2 6 6.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 5.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 6
9% 8.38 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CT51264BD186DJ.M8F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.8% Poor
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.8
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.1
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 7100 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 7100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback