Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C855D-12J (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD PLCBX8
Memory	2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121212
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '20 at 09:55
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za) 3,595 User benchmarks, average bench 25% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Memory 32.8 1-Core 11.1 2-Core 15.3 15% 19.7 Pts	4-Core 22.1 8-Core 29 3% 25.5 Pts	64-Core 33.5 2% 33.5 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7400M 4,688 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FB33) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.3% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 2.5 2% 2.87 fps	MRender 2.38 Gravity 2 Splatting 2.83 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.3% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 404GB free (System drive) Firmware: GG2OA7A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 26 29 25 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 17.3 Write 78.3 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 29.3 28% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 79% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ASint SSZ302G08-GDJEC Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 6GB 667, 800 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.89% Terrible	MC Read 0.8 MC Write 0.6 MC Mixed 3.8 5% 1.73 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 0.8 4% 1.53 GB/s	Latency 239 17% 239 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 25%, 3,595 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 7400MAMDBench 2%, 4,688 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	1x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 44%, 115 samples	1x

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $38

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16