Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	7.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700T 7,380 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Memory 91.7 1-Core 115 2-Core 199 79% 135 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 632 62% 509 Pts	64-Core 605 38% 605 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia 930MX 7,330 User benchmarks, average bench 8% HP(103C 82DC) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4106 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	7.78% Terrible	Lighting 9.83 Reflection 6.85 Parallax 8.16 8% 8.28 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 6.87 7% 9.24 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.78% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk SD8SMAT-128G-1006 128GB 313 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2311006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 38 38 40 41 39 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 64%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 869GB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 119 120 122 122 122 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 114 Write 112 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 118 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB 62,266 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	76.6% Very good	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 22 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 29.1 SC Mixed 24.4 68% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-7700TIntelBench 72%, 7,380 samples	4x

GPU
930MXNvidiaBench 8%, 7,330 samples	2x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	2x

SSD
SD8SMAT-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 55%, 313 samples	3x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	3x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16