Asus H81-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131204
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 16:32
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3220-$36
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 131
52% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 149
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
XFX(1682 3030) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.66
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.42 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B 500GB
248GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 35 42 65 51 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
26% Poor
Read 45.6
Write 79.6
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 44.1
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26%
Great: 42%
WD WD5000AVVS-63M8B 500GB
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 38 49 68 61 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 48.1
Write 81.1
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 49.7
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Kingston 99U542P-014.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81-PLUS Builds (Compare 847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-PLUS - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $461
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback