Acer Veriton 6800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton 6800  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer M945G
Memory0.9 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20061110
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 11:59
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 3.40GHz
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 27.2
2-Core 53.2
33% 47.7 Pts
4-Core 53.8
8-Core 54
7% 53.9 Pts
64-Core 55
3% 55 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160215SCE 160GB-$20
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ACF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 60 46 60 71 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 66
Write 56.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 55.3
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x0.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback