Gigabyte GA-Z87X-OC-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z87X-OC
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-OC-CF  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 27 '16 at 08:36
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4771-$129
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 219
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 587
64% 507 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
EVGA(3842 2883) 3GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 372.90
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 84.4
56% 73.4 fps
MRender 80.4
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 51.3
54% 68.3 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 120GB
70GB free
Firmware: SAFM22.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 506
Write 327
Mixed 343
87% 392 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 8.92
97% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 9.02
64% 148 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 95%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 473
Write 190
Mixed 223
65% 296 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 9.44
87% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 45.6
DQ Mixed 10.6
16% 29.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 82%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
35GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 488
Write 200
Mixed 226
67% 305 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 9.43
87% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 20.9
49% 102 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 0215 CMY8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 0215 CMY8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 22
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 23.7
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87X-OC-CF Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-OC-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $331
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback