Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180208
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 06:44
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 184
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 655
64% 525 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 64
Parallax 66.6
0% 43.6 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 53.3
45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 33 130 15 16 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 349
Write 214
Mixed 221
SusWrite 64
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 28.5
110% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 122
117% 184 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
125GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 67 68 68 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 62.3
Write 66.3
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 67.5
46% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
86GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 69.7
Write 70.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 75.7
83% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $423
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback