Megaware G31T-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMegaware G31T-M  (all builds)
MotherboardMEGAWARE G31T-M
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090420
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 05:14
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5450-$299
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 85.7
44% 67.4 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 166
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 78 88 54 80 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 98
Write 88.2
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 69.4
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
289GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 79 90 58 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 83.3
Write 33.8
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 71.3
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 3.3
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 0.2
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback