Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 04:40
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 95.7
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 144
66% 106 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 356
39% 306 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 1897 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 44.4
Reflection 31
Parallax 38.2
36% 37.9 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 37.1
32% 39 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1230C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 54 51 55 52 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 485
Write 338
Mixed 333
SusWrite 91.7
69% 312 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 36.3
122% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 210
166% 231 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST9250827AS 250GB
13GB free
Firmware: 3.AHC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 8.6 9.1 8.9 9.1 9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 39
Write 8.5
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 8.9
13% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 35%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
5GB free
Firmware: 10.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.7 8.8 9 8.9 8.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 8
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 8.8
12% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 35%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
63GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 56.5
Write 26.2
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 26
26% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
58GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 66.7
Write 29
Mixed 36
SusWrite 34.9
31% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721075CLA332 750GB-$190
23GB free
Firmware: JP3O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 35 37 35 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 91.7
Write 33
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 35.6
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 76%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56
779GB free
Firmware: AX1P2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 49
Write 15.5
Mixed 21
SusWrite 17.7
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 62%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
478GB free
Firmware: MX4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 40 41 42 40 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 157
Write 38.8
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 41
55% 74 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
127GB free
Firmware: MX4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 39 39 36 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 84.8
Write 30
Mixed 36
SusWrite 38.1
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
114% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 108%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$78
5GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 59.2
Write 12.3
Mixed 12
SusWrite 12
17% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 19.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 14.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback