Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 66.5 2-Core 123 60% 94.3 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 293 32% 255 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.73% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 4.31 Parallax 4.16 4% 4.29 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.71 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.73% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102M3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 51 57 61 58 58 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	32.5% Below average	Read 235 Write 80.9 Mixed 61.3 SusWrite 58.6 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 9 48% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 57.9 DQ Mixed 56.2 58% 97.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 CT51264BA160B.C16F 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.6 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 12.4 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	22x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples	24x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	9x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	5x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $348

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16