Asus G53SX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G53SX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G53SX
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111220
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 27 '16 at 05:52
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 145
54% 94 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 107
27% 176 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M
Asus(1043 2100) 2GB
CLim: 775 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 359.46
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
7.71% Terrible
Lighting 9.03
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 7.03
7% 8.85 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 9.93
Splatting 10.4
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.71%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Zotac Premium Edition 240GB-$75
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 502
Write 487
Mixed 511
112% 500 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 11.5
65% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 56.8
DQ Write 53.1
DQ Mixed 11
20% 40.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 109%
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$45
521GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 77.6
Write 74.2
Mixed 83
59% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.26
70% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KSN-4G 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
37.2% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G53SX Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G53SX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback