Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 78.3 1-Core 75.7 2-Core 143 60% 99 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 239 25% 199 Pts	64-Core 237 15% 237 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 80%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 240GB 7,812 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: LSF036C SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 141 103 103 103 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 389 Write 254 Mixed 267 SusWrite 120 57% 257 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 57.1 4K Mixed 34.2 106% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 289 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 209 157% 214 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB 96,646 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	43.6% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 11.8 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 13.7 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,119x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	1,074x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	667x

SSD
NVMe TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zms256gBench 87%, 7,395 samples	246x
hynix SC311 SATA 128GBSKBench 65%, 20,313 samples	216x
hynix SC311 SATA 256GBSKBench 78%, 22,335 samples	152x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBUnknownBench 41%, 10,071 samples	590x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBUnknownBench 41%, 5,658 samples	184x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBUnknownBench 44%, 3,713 samples	171x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16