Dell Inspiron 24-3455

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell Inspiron 24-3455  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 03PYWR
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 23:40
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 32.2
2-Core 61
32% 49.3 Pts
4-Core 73.5
8-Core 105
11% 89.3 Pts
64-Core 120
8% 120 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Dell(1028 06D1) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.28
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 3.53
2% 3.69 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 3.43
2% 2.94 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
828GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0P3D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 80 71 78 82 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 17.7
Write 46
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 73.5
27% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
29% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 62%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 165 164 177 175 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 112
Write 135
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 167
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.7
272% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 Kingston KN2M64-ETB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.1
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 5.3
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 24-3455 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 24-3455

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback