Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 89 1-Core 75.2 2-Core 135 62% 99.7 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 182 24% 182 Pts	64-Core 173 11% 173 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M 5,654 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 1682) 1GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	1.62% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 1.5 2% 2.09 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 0.09 1% 1.79 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.62% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB 16,974 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 58 20 15 88 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 408 Write 294 Mixed 210 SusWrite 63.9 54% 244 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 13.3 49% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 72.1 DQ Mixed 42.3 46% 77.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB 25,458 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	55.9% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 18.4 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 15.2 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	105x
GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 5,654 samples	45x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
ASU1333S9-4G-ECEWG 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 555 samples	18x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	11x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	8x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16