XMG P65xSE-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemXMG P65xSE-A  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P65xSE-A
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 20:53
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 227
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 602
65% 517 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 5600
Clevo(1558 6555) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5107
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 456 473 465 476 475 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 473
Mixed 378
SusWrite 466
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 42.3
145% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 356
256% 332 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3N18AES4.16FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.6% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 22.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 21
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65xSE-A Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: XMG P65xSE-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback