Dell OptiPlex 990

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 990
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 990  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 18:22
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$191
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 181
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 454
51% 402 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 36.7
31% 35.1 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 35.2
30% 37 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 39 49 51 55 12 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.7% Poor
Read 162
Write 99
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 59
22% 99 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 9.1
40% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 10.6
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 11.3
9% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 85%
SSD 960GB
830GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 178 192 187 186 191 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.2% Good
Read 209
Write 105
Mixed 253
SusWrite 171
42% 184 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 29.3
103% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 178
144% 203 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
123GB free
Firmware: GG2OA7A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 61 62 63 64 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 90.5
Write 85.3
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 61.8
49% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 126 130 134 134 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 69
Write 112
Mixed 77
SusWrite 121
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 859B CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 830B NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 859B CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 990 Builds (Compare 3,993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 990

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback