Asus H110-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 16:20
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 233
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 709
69% 568 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 128
Parallax 141
117% 137 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 126
Splatting 100
107% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU600 120GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0301A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 60 50 52 63 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
74% Very good
Read 461
Write 83.5
Mixed 222
SusWrite 61.1
45% 207 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 42.7
152% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 44.3
DQ Mixed 117
82% 108 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74%
Great: 103%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
174GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 465 473 459 424 270 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 480
Mixed 455
SusWrite 424
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 59.7
197% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 353
264% 352 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
798GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 172 167 175 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 169
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 169
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 22.5
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,768 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H110-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback