TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20078

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20078  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 14:58
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 75
2-Core 115
58% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 186
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 57.4%
 Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6300M
Legend(17AA 3979) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.57
Reflection 2.27
Parallax 1.88
1% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2.17
1% 1.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.34%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 74 83 86 85 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.7% Below average
Read 229
Write 208
Mixed 112
SusWrite 97.4
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 6.6
38% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 82
DQ Mixed 12.1
33% 70.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 30.7%
 Great: 53%
Toshiba MK6465GSX 640GB
84GB free
Firmware: GJ004E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 76 77 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 57.1
Write 55.8
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 75.3
38% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 38.1%
 Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B1G73BH0-YK0 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.3% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 29.3%
 Great: 41%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 20078 Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20078

CPU
Core i5-2410MIntel  $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples20x
Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples20x
Pentium B940IntelBench 44%, 3,831 samples18x
GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples84x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples42x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples28x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples11x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples6x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples4x
RAM
RMT3020EC58E9F1333 1x4GBRamaxelBench 25%, 2,506 samples6x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples6x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback