Notebook W650EH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemNotebook W650EH  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W650EH
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130506
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 12:18
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
U29, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 162
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 222
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6500) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 8.62
Parallax 2.78
3% 5.13 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.7
4% 4.82 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 151 150 151 151 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 458
Write 440
Mixed 350
SusWrite 181
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 39.8
130% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 362
274% 368 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 115%
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1048
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 94 93 94 93 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 77.1
Write 79.9
Mixed 48.4
SusWrite 92.2
101% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 859B CT102464BF160B.M16 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W650EH Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W650EH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback