Asus H110M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-C (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190724
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '20 at 07:03
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 111 2-Core 238 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 673 61% 514 Pts	64-Core 668 41% 668 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 C75C) ≥ 4GB; 602-V375-359SB1911000809 CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.1% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 116 Parallax 118 98% 118 fps	MRender 166 Gravity 115 Splatting 92.4 98% 125 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 120GB 3,248 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0422C Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 485 Write 396 Mixed 354 91% 412 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 92 4K Mixed 38.3 140% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 225 186% 265 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 14GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 78 59 78 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 79 Write 89.3 Mixed 77 SusWrite 75.8 60% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 67%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 127GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 109 109 110 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Read 165 Write 157 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 109 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 332GB free Firmware: KC66 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 64 23 39 60 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	48.1% Average	Read 117 Write 27 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 50.7 49% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 55GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 59 58 57 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 84.5 Write 55 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 57.7 45% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 223% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 109%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 494GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 77 80 80 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 78 Write 84 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 79 54% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB 8,407 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	73.7% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 23.5 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 27.2 SC Mixed 22.2 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $78Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	177x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	147x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	116x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	99x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	92x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	68x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	41x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	19x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	18x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16