To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '20 at 10:44
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 71.5 2-Core 144 61% 100 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 615 56% 469 Pts	64-Core 830 51% 830 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.62% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 4.19 Parallax 4.09 4% 4.18 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 3.77 Splatting 5.96 4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.62% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme NE-256 256GB 345 User benchmarks, average bench 138% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0705A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 748 766 283 366 220 420 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	159% Outstanding	Read 1,463 Write 1,127 Mixed 937 SusWrite 467 222% 998 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 95.7 4K Mixed 37.5 161% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 541 DQ Write 534 DQ Mixed 74.1 183% 383 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 195%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB 23,667 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 264GB free Firmware: CA14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 87 88 88 87 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 85.8 Write 85 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 87.3 57% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0- 1x16GB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 10.4 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 9.6 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	724x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	283x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	269x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	621x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	307x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16