Lenovo 4284W5A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4284W5A  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4284W5A
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '20 at 20:09
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2860QM-$469
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 177
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 435
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M
Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 21.21.13.7755
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 4.73
Parallax 1.84
3% 3.54 fps
MRender 6.19
Gravity 4.37
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.55 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO mSATA 250GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT43B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 225 228 229 229 231 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.3% Above average
Read 237
Write 222
Mixed 203
SusWrite 227
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 23.7
85% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 176
138% 190 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 121%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
253GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 105 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 93.1
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 105
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
446GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 119 118 117 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 115
Write 116
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 117
67% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 859B CT102464BF160B.C16 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 17.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback