MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	60.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C37
Motherboard	MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190910
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '20 at 19:33
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Memory 82.2 1-Core 153 2-Core 299 96% 178 Pts	4-Core 592 8-Core 951 95% 772 Pts	64-Core 1,097 68% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Lighting 75.5 Reflection 78.2 Parallax 75.3 62% 76.3 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 70.2 Splatting 73.2 59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 893GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 120 Write 128 Mixed 93 85% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 85%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 64GB-$48 753 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 45GB free, PID 16b3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 266 Write 173 Mixed 87.7 198% 175 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.7 123% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 90%
SMI USB disk 8GB 5,941 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.9 2.4 0 1.3 4.8 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	4.08% Terrible	Read 14.5 Write 2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 2.9 6% 5.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.08% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x4GB 350 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.8% Excellent	MC Read 33.7 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 32.4 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.9 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 33.3 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,062 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $206Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,088x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	999x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $159Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	626x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	449x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	379x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	341x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	230x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	188x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	151x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	240x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	115x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,000

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16