HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory2.4 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '20 at 17:42
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 84.6
44% 66.8 Pts
4-Core 82.1
8-Core 85.5
11% 83.8 Pts
64-Core 83.8
5% 83.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
453GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 117 123 134 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 125
Write 110
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 124
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 174%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 40GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $117
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback