Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJan 19 '20 at 17:13
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$55
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 102
51% 80.2 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 224
24% 191 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.8% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 66.1
Parallax 83.1
54% 71.7 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 54
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 133 117 109 97 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 346
Write 316
Mixed 69
SusWrite 115
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 23.7
83% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 67.6
DQ Mixed 34.1
30% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 88%
HFS256G32MND-2900A 256GB
109GB free
Firmware: 20200L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 134 118 109 97 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 348
Write 292
Mixed 227
SusWrite 116
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 20.1
75% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 77.9
DQ Mixed 26.3
27% 41.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 81%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
50GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 83 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 82
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 82.8
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB
131GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 104 105 104 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 85.2
Write 79
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 103
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 82%
Seagate Portable 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 25
Write 26.8
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 26.8
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.7
163% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 10
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback