Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '20 at 15:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 174
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 350
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 26
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 0.09
21% 16.9 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 25.7
24% 29.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 14 4.2 46 27 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 434
Write 293
Mixed 202
SusWrite 54.1
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 16.5
66% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 72.8
DQ Mixed 30.2
40% 73.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
451GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 111 111 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 188
Write 150
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 110
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL7-4GBRH 04CD F3-10666CL7-2GBRH 04CD F3-10666CL7-4GBRH 04CD F3-10666CL7-2GBRH 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback