Gigabyte GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics63.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 GAMING SLI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '20 at 09:49
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$136
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 97.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 290
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 830
87% 699 Pts
64-Core 828
51% 828 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.7% Good
Lighting 80.9
Reflection 79.2
Parallax 66.9
66% 75.7 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 72.1
59% 72.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 467 466 467 402 392 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 407
Mixed 400
SusWrite 440
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 39.9
144% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 143
115% 165 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
143GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 72 77 80 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 81.3
Write 122
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 77.3
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
205% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 90%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
150GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 51 50 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37% Below average
Read 77.6
Write 61.7
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 50.9
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37%
Great: 57%
Seagate M3 1TB
196GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 41 42 40 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 29.6
Write 28.8
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 39.7
24% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 64%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
413GB free, PID 0470
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 42 43 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 37.9
Write 41
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 42.3
50% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 18%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
10GB free, PID 047a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 43 43 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 40
Write 40.1
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 42.2
50% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 29.3
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 30.8
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 49.1
81% 49.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF Builds (Compare 1,370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $561
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback