HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics76.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 843B
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 19 '20 at 06:49
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 253
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 735
77% 620 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.9% Very good
Lighting 98.9
Reflection 89.5
Parallax 87.6
81% 92 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 85.4
Splatting 73.7
70% 87 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 721 720 668 620 569 564 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 629
Write 456
Mixed 495
SusWrite 644
125% 556 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 54.6
180% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 654
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 390
304% 431 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 141%
Great: 147%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A362 500GB
416GB free
Firmware: PC4ACB0F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 106 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 107
Write 96.7
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 106
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%
Toshiba MK2556GSY 250GB
196GB free
Firmware: LH003C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 102 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 101
63% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 24.8
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 26.3
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 86%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-0xxx Builds (Compare 1,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback