Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A75M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130318
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJan 19 '20 at 04:54
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 59
2-Core 71.1
48% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 95.6
14% 100 Pts
64-Core 95.7
6% 95.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 852D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.73
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 0.34
1% 0.85 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 1.13
1% 0.92 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.65%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 87 96 92 91 98 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45% Average
Read 213
Write 141
Mixed 193
SusWrite 94.3
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 21.5
82% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 116
90% 123 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 45%
Great: 75%
Excelstor Technology J8160S 165GB
142GB free
Firmware: P22OA50U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 64 64 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 67.7
Write 63.3
Mixed 42.6
SusWrite 64.8
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GR1333D364L9S GR1333D364L9/ 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.3% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 8.6
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A75M-HD2 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback