HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory1.5 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '16 at 15:42
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 41.4
2-Core 82.7
44% 66.5 Pts
4-Core 81.9
8-Core 84.6
11% 83.2 Pts
64-Core 82.8
5% 82.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 111
Write 113
Mixed 101
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.59
105% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 74%
USB Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID 5598
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 8.22
Mixed 10.3
17% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.63
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.93
100% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:04 43 RMR1870EF48E8W133 40GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19.4% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback