ECS A55F-M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS A55F-M3 (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20111004
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '20 at 18:05
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-3300 APU-$90 2,884 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Memory 29.1 1-Core 29.1 2-Core 48.7 22% 35.6 Pts	4-Core 57 8-Core 65.1 8% 61 Pts	64-Core 64.7 4% 64.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 2% AMD(1002 9645) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	1.59% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 3.42 Parallax 1.47 1% 2.22 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 3 2% 2.21 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.59% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB 6,367 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 228GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 63 48 55 27 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 4.2 Write 12.8 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 48.2 19% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.3 82% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 8GB 698 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	23.4% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 9.5 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 4.6 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 260 15% 260 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A55F-M3 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A55F-M3

CPU
A6-3500 APUAMD $60Bench 39%, 2,804 samples	8x
Athlon II X4 631AMDBench 46%, 1,364 samples	7x
A4-3300 APUAMD $90Bench 35%, 2,884 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	7x
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples	5x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x

SSD
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	3x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 4GBHynixBench 42%, 98 samples	2x
99U5471-020.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 3,387 samples	1x
9905474-019.A00LF 1x2GBKingstonBench 22%, 127 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $74

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16