Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q900

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q900 (all builds)
Motherboard	AOpen D1009
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111006
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '20 at 09:39
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 78.4 2-Core 143 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 198 26% 196 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
(pe64) Intel 2nd Generation SandyBridge HD Graphics 3000 10 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(A0A0 0809) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	2.01% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 1.5 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 2.38 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.39 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.01% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 83 85 88 89 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 122 Write 99.8 Mixed 114 SusWrite 87.7 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 18.5 69% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 24 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 27.6 31% 50.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 73%
DREVO X1 Pro SSD 128GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 47GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 128 120 112 112 113 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	143% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 107 Mixed 130 SusWrite 117 174% 137 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 28.2 4K Mixed 8.2 1,289% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 17.7 DQ Write 35.4 DQ Mixed 10.5 1,627% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 168%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JSF51264HZ-1G4D1 1x4GB 2,440 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 7.7 24% 8.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 8 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO Q900 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q900

CPU
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples	11x
Core i3-2330MIntel $150Bench 47%, 20,066 samples	7x
Core i3-2310MIntel $80Bench 46%, 25,542 samples	2x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	13x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	10x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	1x
320 Series 120GBIntel $89Bench 40%, 9,651 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	2x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	2x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $69

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16