Lenovo 81JQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 81JQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190108
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '20 at 20:12
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 67
1-Core 14.4
2-Core 60
32% 47.1 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 515
57% 448 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 10 (Ryzen iGPU)
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 23.3
12% 17.4 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 17.5
13% 15.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-512 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0629A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1064 1113 957 263 154 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,414
Write 1,051
Mixed 916
SusWrite 618
223% 1,000 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 35.1
160% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 540
DQ Write 653
DQ Mixed 72.6
200% 422 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 169%
Great: 264%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.1% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 20.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 19.2
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81JQ Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81JQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback