Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA770-UD3  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '20 at 21:34
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 20-$59
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 88.2
47% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 176
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84B5) 1GB
CLim: 1633 MHz, MLim: 1290 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 20.3
1% 13.6 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 20.5
19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 7.17%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY EU SSD CS131 120GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 105 92 93 93 92 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.5% Above average
Read 253
Write 230
Mixed 211
SusWrite 105
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 31.9
111% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 122
98% 139 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 55%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 300GB
45GB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 61 59 58 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 252
Write 200
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 59.3
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 166%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 700GB
174GB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 59 58 58 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.6% Good
Read 171
Write 166
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 57.9
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA770-UD3 Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback