Asus M2N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M2N  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '20 at 18:49
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 38.5
2-Core 73.3
38% 58.1 Pts
4-Core 75.8
8-Core 75.5
10% 75.7 Pts
64-Core 76.6
5% 76.6 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
Sapphire(174B 1482) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 13.2
10% 12.4 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 12.7
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 48 47 45 50 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 52
Write 51
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 47.2
36% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 35%
Seagate ST3500410AS 500GB
24GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 70 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 77.7
Write 81.5
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 70.9
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
281GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 76 77 78 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 80.3
Write 69.3
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 77.5
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
757GB free
Firmware: MX4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 112 112 114 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 120
Write 122
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 113
68% 94 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
502GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 21.5
Write 21.2
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 21.2
28% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback