Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	93.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '20 at 15:18
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 75.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 199 71% 126 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 609 61% 498 Pts	64-Core 813 50% 813 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% PowerColor(148C 2398) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.1 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93.9% Outstanding	Lighting 105 Reflection 114 Parallax 229 86% 149 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 125 Splatting 155 110% 131 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75 109,999 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 312GB free (System drive) Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1098 860 856 856 857 856 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	240% Outstanding	Read 1,959 Write 1,941 Mixed 1,648 SusWrite 897 362% 1,611 MB/s	4K Read 45.6 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 67.8 235% 87.5 MB/s	DQ Read 827 DQ Write 691 DQ Mixed 752 565% 757 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 240% Great: 297%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 233GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 319 318 318 318 318 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 457 Mixed 409 SusWrite 326 94% 420 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 56.7 191% 66.8 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 359 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 124%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 56GB free Firmware: UH4400RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 257 194 9.3 131 15 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	52% Above average	Read 440 Write 398 Mixed 283 SusWrite 168 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 15.1 64% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 89.7 DQ Mixed 29.4 42% 79.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 58%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$70 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 128 129 129 129 129 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Read 165 Write 158 Mixed 83.3 SusWrite 128 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 113%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 137 138 137 137 138 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	76.6% Very good	Read 132 Write 104 Mixed 72 SusWrite 135 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 96%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$70 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 172 172 172 172 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 158 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 171 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB 10,048 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	MC Read 37.1 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 33.2 95% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 34.7 SC Mixed 27.7 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 88.6 45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	53x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	24x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,068

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)