Lenovo 80XU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80XU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '20 at 04:45
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 75.8
40% 62.4 Pts
4-Core 77.2
8-Core 76.6
10% 76.9 Pts
64-Core 94.6
6% 94.6 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 39F9) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 17.7
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.96
Parallax 1.38
1% 1.45 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 77 53 110 188 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 329
Write 290
Mixed 278
SusWrite 105
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 27.2
94% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 41
DQ Mixed 18.4
31% 63 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
608GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 111 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 66.2
Write 105
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 110
62% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
72% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80XU Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80XU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback