Asus G30AB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G30AB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G30AB
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140304
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 13 '20 at 22:27
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 105
2-Core 186
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 557
55% 449 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Asus(1043 86BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.3% Average
Lighting 51.6
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 48.4
42% 53.2 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 67.4
51% 62.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 41 5 9.2 75 19 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42% Average
Read 342
Write 102
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 32.9
30% 140 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 17.8
76% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 99.1
DQ Write 56.5
DQ Mixed 39.9
40% 65.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
135GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 99 100 100 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 105
Write 108
Mixed 59
SusWrite 99
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MI64C1D1629Z1 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 17.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G30AB Builds (Compare 243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Asus G30AB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback